{"id":397,"date":"2021-02-01T16:20:08","date_gmt":"2021-02-01T16:20:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/safetyandhealthsafetyshares.com\/?p=397"},"modified":"2021-02-01T16:20:11","modified_gmt":"2021-02-01T16:20:11","slug":"dirty-bombs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/safetyandhealthsafetyshares.com\/?p=397","title":{"rendered":"Dirty Bombs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

2\/11\/2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In recent years, a new term in warfare has emerged: Dirty Bombs.\u00a0 This term made notoriety in America in June 2002, when an al-Qaida terrorist named Jos\u00e9 Padilla was arrested at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago and charged with assisting in the construction of such a device.\u00a0 A dirty bomb or radiological dispersal device (RDD) combines radioactive material with conventional explosives.\u00a0 The design of such a device is to spread radioactive material and contaminate the immediate area, thereby creating fear and intimidation to civilians. So while RDDs require radioisotopes as a major component, the activation sequence should not be confused with a nuclear explosion, such as a fission bomb<\/a> as what occurred in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Though an RDD would be designed to disperse radioactive material over a specified area, a bomb<\/a> that uses conventional explosives and produces a blast wave<\/a> could be far more lethal than the hazard posed by radioactive material that may be mixed with conventional explosives.  The fact is, when appropriate actions are taken, the levels created from the radioactive materials used in a dirty bomb, would not cause enough radiation<\/a> to result in severe illness or death. A test explosion and subsequent calculations performed by the United States Department of Energy<\/a> found that, assuming nothing is done to clean up an affected area where persons remain in the area for one year, while radiation exposures would be “fairly high” but not fatal, such potential health effects would be due to – not the immediate exposure – but rather to the continuous exposure as a result of a lack of decontamination. Recent analysis of the nuclear fallout<\/a> from the Chernobyl disaster<\/a> confirms this, showing that the effect on many people in the surrounding area \u2013 with the exception of those in close proximity to the event – was almost negligible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The radioactive material typically associated with dirty bombs include one of the following radioisotopes: cobolt-60, strontiom-90 or cesium-137; although other materials can be used.  Yes, these materials are radioisotopes and therefore can cause serious health effects to humans when an exposure is considerable (close contact and actual physical interaction for extended periods of time). These materials are typically the result <\/em>of a fission reaction as opposed to creating <\/em>a fission reaction.  The main purpose of dirty bombs or RDDs, is to generate public fear; specifically, due to the physical release of these radioisotopes.  This fear is the result of the public having very little knowledge of radioactivity, in conjunction with negative perceptions of such materials that have developed over the years.    <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nevertheless, like many other things in our world, radioactive materials can be harmful when improperly handled or used. An example occurred Goi\u00e2nia<\/a>, Brazil<\/a>, in the late 1980s when two metal scavengers broke into an abandoned radiotherapy<\/a> clinic and removed a teletherapy<\/a> source capsule containing powdered cesium-137 with an activity of 50 terabecquerels (a terabecquerel is equal to 1 trillion decays per second or 27 curies). They brought the radioactive source back to the home of one of the men to take it apart and sell as scrap metal. Later that day both men were showing acute signs of radiation illness with vomiting<\/a> and diarrhea while one of the men had a swollen hand. A few days later one of the men punctured the 1 mm thick window of the capsule, allowing the cesium chloride<\/a> powder to leak out and when realizing the powder glowed blue in the dark, he brought it back home to his family and friends to show it off. After 2 weeks of showing this material to the community, several people exhibited adverse health effects due to the apparent contamination, resulting in 20 people becoming seriously ill including 5 fatalities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So while non-fissile radioactive material can cause severe illness, by understanding the characteristics of radionuclides and employing the simple controls of reducing exposure time, increasing distance and the use of shielding, the effects of a dirty bomb would be unlikely to cause the devastation as what occurred in Goi\u00e2nia<\/a>, Brazil<\/a>.  Therefore without proper community knowledge, a dirty bomb can create an alarming degree of chaos through mass panic<\/a>. For this reason, dirty bombs are sometimes called “weapons of mass disruption.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dirty bombs have been used in recent history; most notably in Chechnya during the separatist movement in the 1990\u2019s.  During this conflict there were two cases of cesium-containing bombs.  One involved a buried cesium-137<\/a> source that was wrapped in explosives and another involved a container filled with radioactive materials attached to an explosive mine. In both cases, the mandatory initial detonation by conventional explosive devices were never initiated.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

One way to mitigate the effects of RDDs (i.e. panic and terror) is to educate the public on the nature of radioactive materials. As with many hazards, education on radiation is one of the most effective, yet most neglected mitigating factor related to radiological terrorism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Dirty Bomb Fact Sheet from FEMA states that the main danger of a dirty bomb comes from the initial blast rather than the radioactive materials. FEMA suggests the following guidelines to mitigate the risk of radiation exposure:<\/p>\n\n\n\n